The movie “Citizen Kane” in my book was not bad, but not good. It had a lot of good things about it like editing, lighting, shots, and characters that made it OK, but I would not call it one of the best movies out there. It just didn’t keep me entertained and in a few spots it was very boring. More action in the film would have made it better, but I don’t think it would have gone along with the movie.
5 comments:
Well, in MY book, i too thought it was very anti-climactic. I don't think action was the only thing that could have made it better; more deep or significant of a plot could have done the trick. I just think the whole idea of following one ambitious man's life is just incredibly boring. To conclude, i agree with the movieman. 212121.
Well, in MY book, I thought it was also bad for the same reasons as you; did not keep me entertained, no action, characters were bland.
Yes the cinimatography acpect was good and the only thing that keeped my interest but also as hunter said action is not the only thing that could have "done the trick" and made this movie some what entertaining.
But all in all The Movie Man(212121) is always right because he is the movie man.
Well, in my book, I thought The film was very boring and not too interesting. I think more action could have brought out more fun in the film, but where would that action fit in? There's not too many places where action would be necessary.
Well, in MY book, I also did not enjoy it, but i thought it came to a very large climax right at the end of the movie. and it isn't the kind of movie that needs to have action, i don't get how you people think they could have put action into it. it's not an action movie. ALL YOU WATCH ARE ACTION MOVIES JOEY. the movieman212121 however has a far more diverse taste and i respect him immensely for that
i didn't think the movie was so bad. granted there were a few boring spots, but what movies (other that 100% action movies) dont have that. there will always be boring spots in films.
Post a Comment